Towards Open and Equitable Access to Research and Knowledge for Development

PLoS Medicine

Summary Points

  • Unequal access to and distribution of public knowledge is governed by Northern standards and is increasingly inappropriate in the age of the networked “Invisible College”.
  • Academic journals remain the primary distribution mechanism for research findings, but commercial journals are largely unaffordable for developing countries; local journals—more relevant to resolving problems in the South—are near-invisible and under-valued.
  • Donor solutions are unsustainable, are governed by markets rather than user needs, and instil dependency.
  • Open access is sustainable and research driven and builds independence and the capacity to establish a strong research base; it is already converting local journals to international journals.
  • However, as open access becomes the norm, standards for the assessment of journal quality and relevance remain based on Northern values that ignore development needs and marginalise local scholarship.

Available on : http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001016

Publicado em Notícias, Referências Marcado com: , , ,